Review of the thesis

In our life, we very often meet with reviews. Reviews can be on books, films. They help us quickly decide whether or not to read a particular book, watch this or that film. They are written by people who have already read or looked at this or that work. Sometimes they are custom-made and ordered for new things, so that consumers buy this book or this film. We are interested in scientific reviews here. They are written on various kinds of scientific works, such as a scientific article, term paper, thesis, a scientific book. What are the scientific reviews?
Types of scientific reviews
There are at least two classifications of scientific reviews. The first classification is based on where the author works and the author of the review. According to it, reviews can be internal and external. If the reviewer is the scientific supervisor of the author or he works in the same educational institution / research institute, it will be an internal review. If, for example, the editor-in-chief of an attracts an essay writer from outside, this will be an external review. In this case, the specialist should fit certain requirements. In particular, he must have a scientific degree no lower than a candidate of science and have a certain experience in writing scientific papers. According to the second classification, reviews are subdivided according to the types of work to which they are written. So, reviews are written on scientific articles, term papers, theses, scientific books. In general, their content varies, although, of course, they have common features that allow them to be combined into one type of work. In any case, regardless of the work that the review is written on, there should be a complete and objective analysis of the work done with a reasoned indication of strengths and weaknesses, as well as evaluation of research methods.
General in the structure of scientific reviews
Of course, scientific reviews have, in general, the same structure. So, any review begins with the subject. In this part, it is prescribed for which type (article, thesis, thesis), this review is written, indicating the author of the source text. Then comes the introduction, which draws attention to the relevance of the problem, how important it is, etc. In the main part, a brief summary of the original work is presented, with a comprehension of this content and its connection with the available knowledge. In the evaluation part, first a general assessment is given, and then the positive and negative aspects of the work. At the end, general conclusions are drawn depending on the purpose (on the possibility of printing an article, evaluating a thesis or awarding the desired degree).
Review of a scientific article
A review of a scientific article is written when an article is being prepared for publication in a scientific journal. Such articles are written by those who are going to connect their life (or already did it) with science. Often articles are written in the preparation of a dissertation, so the reviewer needs the most benevolent attitude to the author of the work, since here everything differs significantly from the usual scientific discussion in the journal. In terms of the content of the review, it must be indicated in it, what innovative this article brings to science. In addition to indicating the positive aspects (among which there must be novelty and originality of research, the degree of familiarity of the author with literature in this field, modern achievements, the ability to bring his point of view to the reader) and the shortcomings of work should contain a conclusion about the possibility of admission of the article to the press.
If a person decided not to stop at what he had achieved and, after obtaining a bachelor’s degree, he wanted to obtain a master’s degree and then a candidate of science, he should definitely write a thesis. This work shows how much he is ready to continue his scientific work and, accordingly, how well he was formed as a scientist. Accordingly, here the reviewer should be maximally located and supportive of the candidate, because this, in fact, determines the fate of a person in the profession and science. Here we briefly reviewed what kinds of reviews there are. To learn more about them in a little more detail, you can read other publications in our service. Good luck in applying your knowledge to practice!