The phraseology of a scientific study

The phraseology of a scientific, dissertational study presupposes the use of such combinations of words as “based on the data obtained”, “summarizing all that mentioned above”, “as analysis showed,” “it follows from here.” In the text of the thesis complex sentences of various kinds with clear syntactic connections are used to express complex arguments and to identify the cause-effect relationship. Therefore, the thesis text often uses prepositions, subordinate unions, combinations “in view of what”, “after”, “instead of”, “while”, “because of what”, “between” “because”, “because”, “because of”, “along with”, “in connection with”, “during”, “in accordance with”, “as a result”, etc. Words and phrases are widely used, indicating the degree of reliability of the study and its conclusions. A high college essay writer by virtue of their use, the proposed fact or conclusion can be represented by a) completely reliable (“of course”, “of course,” “really”), b) supposed (“presumably”, “apparently”), c) possible (“probably” “perhaps”). To represent the reliability, objectivity of the fact, the dissertator informs about its source, indicates to whom exactly the thought, conclusion, position belongs. For this, certain words and phrases are used, such as “according to information”, “according to data”, “in opinion”, “according to the message”, etc. If the author’s position is “in our opinion”.

The pronouns “something” and other words and phrases of speech that allow for the uncertainty of perception are illogical in the scientific text. To express an excellent degree, the words “most”, “least” are accepted, but words like “faster” and “higher” are not used.

In general, words that reflect an excellent degree are undesirable in the thesis, which must be accurate, unambiguously perceived.

Often arises the question about the use of “I” and “we”. The thesis is a purely author’s work, personal, therefore everything in it said, written is the author’s, therefore, the “I”. The pronoun “we”, as it were, speaks of the modesty of the author, but the question arises: “Who are we”? – it can be the author and his supervisor / consultant, maybe a scientific team, etc. When there is personal work, which is the thesis, there should be no inaccuracy. It is quite logical to represent the scientific results of the collective through the pronoun “we”, it is also logical to represent our work through the “I”. When presenting a thesis, no accurate speech produces not the best impression, although everyone understands that an attempt is made here to look more modest. The applicants in their presentation of work resort to speech constructions that exclude the use of the pronoun “we”.

The thesis demands clarity, and for this it is necessary to write accessible and intelligible. The authors often admit that the loss of clarity of presentation is caused by the desire to give the text of the thesis a scientific character. Sometimes the accessibility and lucidity of the text is considered to be its simplicity. But the clarity and general availability of the scientific language of presentation only contribute to the fact that the text of the thesis is read easily, thoughts, statements, conclusions of the author are perceived without difficulty. But simplicity in no way should lead to primitiveness. If you want to make sure that everything is appropriate the standards, you may ask help of service essay writer, and how to choose them also describes in our service.