How the review for a thesis looks like?

Posted by under Review for a thesis

The question “How to write a review for a thesis?” excites not only experienced employees of enterprises and educational institutions, but also students and essay writers.

 What is a review of the thesis?

This is a document that presents an analysis in terms of the compliance of work with existing state standards and the evaluation of a student’s scientific research. Without a review the student is not allowed to defend his work. The review, which creates a favorable impression on the commission, is a pledge of protection for “excellent”.
Who writes a review of the thesis work
Ideally, a review of the thesis is written by a graduate in the field of the research being analyzed. A reviewer can be a representative of an educational institution (except for representatives of the department where the student’s supervisor works). Maybe it should be a representative of the enterprise where the student was practicing (especially this is true if the degree work is related to the labor process of this enterprise). The reviewer is looking for the student himself or the graduating department chooses. But all this is a formality, after all, most often the “defender of the thesis” has to write his own analysis of his work. In this situation, there is one big plus: the student is perfectly aware of the content of his work.
Contents of the review of the thesis
The content of the review has a clear structure The content of the review generally corresponds to this structure: the title (the subject of the study being analyzed, the faculty, the full name of the student, the number of the student’s group); assessment of the relevance of the work (volume – 1-2 proposals); general assessment of the quality of the thesis, this item can include such elements: a selection of literature (credibility, reliability, novelty of sources, quantitative indicator); the proportionality of the parts of the work (do not forget that the theoretical part should be slightly less practical); completeness of disclosure of the declared subject; the capacity of brief conclusions at the end of each part of the work; features of the use of terms; availability of illustrative material; analysis of individual chapters on the level of scientific style, the ability to draw their conclusions, based on existing theoretical data, the depth of analysis in the practical part.
Pros and cons of the study.
The possibility of using the results in practice. Compliance of the qualification work, to which its author claims, an evaluation of the work. information about the referee: name, title, scientific degree, signature, seal of the enterprise / organization. This is a general scheme for writing a review of the thesis work, you can make your own corrections to it, because the form of presentation in this genre is free. Making a review of the thesis work does not have strict requirements, but it is better to use the traditional parameters.

This list of rules is compiled on the basis of reviews written by experienced authors: The thesis must be carefully read (if you are not its author) in order to be well-oriented in its content and be able to objectively evaluate the merits and demerits of the study. Do not use common template phrases that do not have the proper informative saturation, for example: excellent work, very good scientific research. To link the parts of the review, it is necessary to use phrase-clichés of scientific style. Do not use watery, empty phrases, because laconism is one of the main features of the review. It is better to express your thoughts with simple sentences, since complex subjects are difficult to perceive.
In addition to the above rules and advice, you must always remember the main of them – a fair assessment of the work without subjectivity, even if it is an analysis of your own work. In case you are not sure in the correctness of all points, you may go to service writer essay, where the specialists will help you in any question.